Thursday, 6 October 2016

Week 29 Activity 5: Ethics with Screenagers

 Legal and ethical contexts in my digital practice



Screenagers

In the last month Education Minister Hekia Parata announced that the Government was looking at students being able to do their schooling entirely online. The internet affords our students huge opportunities but we also have a responsibility to help our students become responsible digital citizens

In our school (BYOD) students have access to most of the internet but social media sites like Facebook have been blocked. I understand that this is primarily to stop it being a distraction to students while they are at school. Of course students with phones using 3G still access their Facebook account at school but most students have internet at home and access Facebook then.

My problem is a group of students I frequently find on the library computers when I am on duty and they are accessing Facebook through a proxy server (although quickly change screens if approached). I know these students don’t have phones and don’t have computers and wifi in their homes. So far I have let it slide, but I am uncomfortable with this situation and would like some resolution.

The reason I have not taken action is because it is lunchtime as opposed to being in class time, and mostly because the students don’t have the same access to the internet outside of school hours. Also I realise that Facebook is not pornography but a social media site.

The reason I do need to take action is because it is against school rules to access blocked sites on school computers and as a teacher I need to stand by those rules. If I am making exceptions, my relationship with students and other staff will be compromised. Other students will see it as unfairness that I am not following school rules. Also the students may be using Facebook in a way that is not responsible and either have negative consequences themselves or end up hurting others.

What could I do?

The codes that I need to consider as an educator would be the NZ Code of Ethics for Certified Teachers which states that

“The professional interactions of teachers are governed by four fundamental principles:
Autonomy to treat people with rights that are to be honoured and defended. Justice to share power and prevent the abuse of power. Responsible care to do good and minimise harm to others. Truth to be honest with others and self."

I could also consider the Connecticut Code of Professional Responsibility for Educators which states that Teachers must respect and uphold the dignity and worth of students as individual human beings, and, therefore, deal justly and considerately with students”

Up to this point I have had a short conversation with the students reinforcing that they should be responsible digital citizens and not go on proxy servers.
I think first off I should have a conversation with the librarian as these students are frequently on the library computers. In future I would also tell the students that I am making a behaviour note to their Dean so that they know there is a consequence and hopefully deter them from this action. The school policy for continued defiance would be to remove their internet access but this would seriously hamper their classroom learning.

I could also ask myself “What would happen if everyone did this?” If this school rule is disregarded by students and teachers then other school rules would also be disregarded and school would no longer be an emotionally and physically safe and healthy learning environment for all students.
Inequity is probably the bigger issue so a more positive outcome would actually be to help these students have their own devices where they could access social media at home.  The problem would be that they still shouldn’t access Facebook in school time and probably can’t afford 3G on a device. It would be best for me to talk to their house Dean’s and discuss their family situations to see if there are ways we can help.

In this ethical situation general rules of conduct and consistency across the school are important principles, but also to consider solving deeper issues of inequity would be best practice.

References

Connecticut’s Teacher Education and Mentoring Program. (2012). Ethical and Professional Dilemmas for Educators: Facilitator’s Guide.
Education Council. (n.d). The Education Council Code of Ethics for Certficated Teachers

Hall, A. (2001). What ought I to do, all things considered? An approach to the exploration of ethical problems by teachers. Paper presented at the IIPE Conference, Brisbane. 

6 comments:

  1. Hi Sue you have raised good and important points regarding should you enthically be obliged to do something about these students accessing facebook. It is a really difficult position to be in as a teacher. I have the same problem in my class with students accessing sites that they shouldnt be, not social media but others sites that they want to access,such as you tube. As a classroom teacher I make sure the rules are clear- all screens are facing me so I can see what they are viewing and I make sure I actively walk around when they are using their devices. Sitting with them on their laps under the table is not necessary! I think it is important the parents play a part in recognising what their children are accessing and are able to access on their devices- unfortuanately a lot of them turn a blind eye or play ignorant to it all, which is their biggest downfall and their kids best weapon! Having access to their passwords, limited screen time and not allowing kids to have their devices in their bedrooms- out of sight, are just small things that they can do to make their own children aware that they do have a bit of control on what they are viewing and doing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Fiona. You have set up some good clear expectations in your classroom and it has given me more to think about when starting the year off next year.
      Nigel Latta has some great videos about keeping teenagers safe on the internet and he also emphasizes keeping devices out of the bedroom.
      All the best, Sue

      Delete
  2. You bring up some really interesting points! I teach juniors so I don't necessarily come across this situation but as the use of social media is getting younger and younger no doubt I will be faced with this one day! I admire you stance on the situation. It is easy as teachers to leap in and correct student behaviour but you have put your students' behaviour in context. If they don't have access at home and no mobile device can make them feel at a disconnect with their peers. Social pressure to keep up with social media trends is important for students (no matter what we think as adults!). This is a grey area in terms of ethics for me - I would be letting them on it but it is what the school's rules are. If there is a blanket ban on use of social media on school devices then the students are crossing boundaries. Since most students have their own devices these days it is much harder to moderate. Such a hard decision to make on these rules and regulations! All the best for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Victoria, yes I would think that if some students can't access social media then they would feel very disconnected to their peers as you say.I am looking forward to having more conversations with other teachers at school about this next week. Appreciate your comments, Sue

      Delete
  3. Hi Sue.
    I understand your dilemma and would probably have responded in the same way as you. This is another example of how we should be looking at these things on a case by case nature.
    I am teaching at Primary school level so many presentations are different. One similarity however, is something I have been reflecting on today.
    We are also a BYOD school. I have one particular lad who is often off task on his school owned Chromebook. First up, I have strict classroom expectations when on the Chromebooks, and there are consequences for off task behaviours.
    Anyway, this lad had no internet access at home, and from what I can tell, very limited device experience. So, when I find him off task and exploring Youtube clips that have nothing to do with his class work I have no choice but to have him put the Chromebook away.
    What I realise now is that he is just doing what all his mates have done over and over in their homes. While I have already acknowledged the lack of class significance, I now feel his 'playing' has an educational significance.
    At this stage this cannot mean I ignore his off task behaviour. The rules are in place for a reason, and I must uphold them. That is not to say I can not create a school related opportunity for him to explore.
    Hmm, I need some more thinking around this.
    Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
    Larisa

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Sue
    Yes that is an ethical dilemma that I think many teachers are facing. Legally under 13s are not meant to be on facebook so this guides our policies. Also with our age group (intermediate) we are frequently dealing with cases of cyber bullying perpetuated through social media. But where do we draw the line? These students have accounts and obviously use them at home should we then be monitoring this behaviour or putting it back on the parents?
    Inequity has always been the elephant in the room, from access to resources, specialists to the more modern day access to devices and wifi. Community libraries help in the instance providing free access to these and books.
    Rules are always a challenge, especially when you do not personally agree or see the harm, but as you have said they are there for a reason. No easy solution so I say follow your heart and your head (as it sounds like you have found the middle ground already)

    ReplyDelete